martes, febrero 05, 2013

REDISEÑAR LA REALIDAD.

"No sabemos quién descubrió el agua, pero sabemos que no fueron los peces." Marshall Mc Luhan. ¿Te has dado cuenta del sistema en que vives?


Ciertamente parecemos condenados a ser coherentes con el pasado, incluso cuando nos rebelamos respecto a él mismo no dejamos de estar condicionados por su influencia definitiva. Es normal pues que después de siglos y siglos y siglos de ejercicio perverso del poder, las personas tengan la sensación de que no hay escapatoria a lo que ha venido a llamarse la “Historia Universal de la Infamia”. La cultura analógica parece hacer sólida las consecuencias inevitables del pasado.

¿Y qué es eso? Pues al parecer para que prevalezca la voluntad del poder en loor de la centralización y los privilegios de los dominantes, alguien debe salir perjudicado  o debe morir, y lo que es más, es la mayoría la que paga con creces los excesos de los poderosos.  Esta regla malvada se ha podido calcular incluso matemáticamente, aquí un ejemplo, “La paradojade Arrow


Así que parece ser, que desde que se fundaron las ciudades Estado y aumentaron de número de población. En este sentido, los riegos plantearon que una ciudad no podía ser verdaderamente gobernable en igualdad si no existen relaciones de parentesco de hasta un tercer nivel consanguíneo. Esto significa simplemente que aquellos que habiten en la cosa pública deben conocerse entre sí. Así pues, el esquema de representatividad democrática actual es el menos malo de los modelos políticos y sin embargo está destinado al fracaso. En realidad, las estructuras piramidales de poder, cuando ocurren en elevado número de población son un caldo de cultivo para la corrupción verbigracia de la burocracia. 

En el modelo asambleario y en el régimen donde todos se conocen, el control de la corrupción es mayor y especialmente de la arbitrariedad política. En la horizontalidad está la clave.  Si las decisiones se toman por régimen asambleario en igualdad entre las personas, la garantía de equitatividad es mucho mayor que en un Estado Nación tal y como se concibe hoy. Es lógico que diga que los Estados deben desaparecer pero en un proceso de regulación de la soberanía individual es preciso que se desconcentre el poder y por ende la población. 

Por otro lado, está la cuestión de la soberanía de los recursos para el bien estar común. Una ciudad por ejemplo es un enorme aspirador de recursos, alimentos, materias primas, recursos, servicios ,etcétera. Y si bien, las ciudades manufacturan materias primas como consecuencia de su evolución desde la baja Edad Media, también lo es que son enormemente dependientes. Por ejemplo, imagínense que le cortamos las vías de comunicación a una gran metrópolis. ¿Cuánto tiempo tardarían sus habitantes en huir por la escazes?


RESHAPE REALITY


Certainly we seem doomed to be consistent with the past, even when we rebel regarding not stop himself be conditioned by definite influence. It is normal that after centuries and centuries of evil exercise of power, people have the feeling that there is no escape from what has been called the "Universal History of Infamy." The culture seems to analog sound past the inevitable consequences. Thus we see the consequences of the actions of our predecessors, we see it in the family and as in the power structures to which we arrive at birth.
And what is that? Well, apparently so that power will prevail in praise of centralization and privileges of the dominant, someone should get hurt or die, and what is more, it is the majority that pays more than the excesses of the powerful or their inability to meet the wishes of the majority. This fact could be calculated even mathematically, is an example, "The paradox of Arrow"

So it appears that since the founding of the city-states and increased number of people, people gave up their individual sovereignty to make them fall on the leader condemning society to live in a political and emotional eternal adolescence. In this sense, the Greeks argued that a city could not be truly governable in equity if there is no kinship to a third level of consanguinity.


This simply means that those who reside in public affairs should know each other. Thus, the current democratic representation scheme is the least bad political models and yet is bound to fail because the administration of the res public can only trust in well doing of a minority which also has all the information. In reality, the pyramid structures of power, when they occur in large numbers of people are a breeding ground for corruption bureaucracy or make  slow motion system.

In the model and in the assembly regime where everyone knows, the control of corruption is higher and especially political arbitrariness, hence, in the horizontal structure of relation of power is the key. If decisions are made by assembly regime in equality between people, ensuring fairness is much greater than in a nation state as conceived today. It is logical to say that states should disappear but in a process of regulating individual sovereignty decentralize need that power and therefore the population.

On the other hand, there is the question of the sovereignty of the resources for the common good. One such city is a huge vacuum of resources, food, raw materials, services, etc.. And while cities manufacture raw materials from its evolution in the late Middle Ages, so is that they are highly dependent. For example, imagine that we cut the lines of communication to a large metropolis. How long would it take its inhabitants to flee by the shortage?

The key to political independence, independence goes through material, but also in reducing the number of participants in the social thing. Does this mean you have to go? No, means to be reorganized in villages that are self-sufficient in terms of food, footwear, clothing, technology and services.

This is not only possible but already existing advanced prototype farms, fish farms, livestock management completely or almost completely automated. It implies a return to rural but won everything with current technological advances in a reorganization of the way we do politics.

Horizontality, food independence, control of resources and appointment of representatives, to participate in the management of public network with other population units. This idea can be developed widely, but it is not about creating a strategy game. It's about creating a system whose purpose is the common wellness and at the same time is manageable for people.

The release of redundant work gives way to creative work, training and specialized political action by citizens. In addition, the cores may produce surpluses to be shared with other cores creating a glut in the scheme is established as globally.

No hay comentarios: